SolutionsCase studiesInsightsCompanyClient login

System 03 — systems

Conversion is a queue,not a redesign.

The Listing & Conversion System mines search terms, reviews, and CVR by placement into ranked hypotheses — then tests them in order. Median winning test in 2025: +18% CVR. 3 of every 7 tests lose, and the losers ship learnings.

Test queue — AQ AquaticsDEMO DATA
T-041 · Hero image — AQ-FILTER-20RunningWinner — shipped
87.0%

STOPS AT 95% — NO PEEKINGVARIANT B · +18% CVR · SOP UPDATED

  • T-042 · Title keyword order — AQ-PUMP-300QUEUED · SCORE 8.1
  • T-043 · A+ comparison table — AQ-HEATER-50WQUEUED · SCORE 7.4
  • T-039 · Bullet reorderSHIPPED · +6% CVR · 12 DAYS
SCORE = EXPECTED IMPACT × CONFIDENCEOWNER: LISTINGS LEAD

Demonstration queue: one hero-image test running at 87 percent confidence, stopping at 95; two tests queued by score; one shipped winner at plus 6 percent conversion.

What it replaces

The redesign that changed nothing. Measurably.

Twice a year, someone rewrites the listing. The founder likes it. The agency invoices it. CVR does what it was always going to do — because nobody tested anything.

FOUNDER OPINIONAGENCY REFRESH2×/YEAR · INVOICEDCOMPETITOR ENVYNEW LISTINGCVR EFFECTUNKNOWN — NO CONTROLSAME DEBATE, NEXT QUARTER — SAME EVIDENCE: NONE
Before — redesign by opinion

Opinion in, invoice out. No control group, no significance, no memory — the same debate repeats next cycle with the same evidence: none.

After — ranked test queue

Hypotheses ranked by expected impact × confidence. Tests stop at significance, winners ship into SOPs, losers are logged. The debate ends because the queue answers it.

The mechanism

Every listing decision has a test ID.

SEARCH-TERM DATAREVIEW MININGCOMPLAINT THEMESCVR BY PLACEMENTWHERE SESSIONS DIEHYPOTHESIS QUEUESCORED · RE-RANKED WEEKLYHUMAN APPROVALOWNER: LISTINGS LEADA/B TESTONE VARIABLESIGNIFICANTAT 95%?YSHIP WINNER → SOPDOCUMENTED · 100%LOG LEARNINGN — RE-RANKS THE QUEUEN
01

Hypotheses come from data the account already generates — what buyers search, what reviews complain about, where sessions die.

02

One variable per test, stopped at 95% significance. No peeking, no calling it early because it "looks done."

03

Losers are assets. A failed test closes a debate permanently — the 43% that lose are why the 57% that win are trusted.

Automation with judgment

What the machine runs. What it never will.

Automated
  • Keyword coverage scan DAILY
  • CVR monitoring by placement PER SESSION DATA
  • Significance math + stop rule 95% · NO OVERRIDE
  • Compliance and suppression checks DAILY
Human-decided
  • Hypothesis approval and ranking review WEEKLY
  • Creative execution — copy, imagery
  • Brand voice and claims
  • Ship or kill on edge cases LOGGED
Automation coverage — this system
0%

63% — the lowest of the 4 systems, on purpose. Creative is judgment. We automate the measurement around it, not the taste inside it.

Typical results — 2025 cohort, installed ≥2 quarters

Winners shipped. Losers reported.

CVR delta — median winning test+0%2025 · all categories
Test win rate0%214 tests · 2025
Time to significance0 daysMedian · 95% threshold
Winners documented as SOPs0%Shipped tests · always
Test T-041 — hero image, lifestyle vs on-white

Which hero image converts?

Variant A
on-white (control)
11.2%
Variant B
in-context
13.2%

N = 4,180 SESSIONS/ARM · 95% SIGNIFICANCE · 11 DAYS

Variant B shipped: +18% CVR. The SOP now requires in-context hero imagery for this category.

Client scorecard · US marketplace · Q1 2026

A B test result: variant A, on-white control, converted 11.2 percent. Variant B, in-context, converted 13.2 percent with 4,180 sessions per arm at 95 percent significance over 11 days.

Constraint

SKUs under ~800 sessions/month can't reach significance. We don't test them — we apply category SOPs and say so, instead of shipping noise dressed as science.

Find out where your sessions die.

The audit maps CVR by placement against your category. Median gap found on the hero SKU: 1.9 pts.